Saturday, December 31, 2011

Marvel vs. DC

Comparison from a movie perspective, with scores based on Rotten Tomatoes' aggregate reviews.

DC:

Year Movie
Score
1978 Superman 94
1981 Superman II 88
1983 Superman III 24
1987 Superman IV 10
1989 Batman 71
1992 Batman Returns 79
1995 Batman Forever 44
1997 Batman & Robin 13
2004 Catwoman 10
2005 Batman Begins 85
2006 Superman Returns 76
2008 The Dark Knight 94
2009 Watchmen 64
2010 Jonah Hex 12
2011 Green Lantern 27

Average 52.73

Median 64

Standard deviation 33.63


Marvel:

Year Movie
Score
2000 X-Men 82
2002 Spider-Man 89
2003 Daredevil 45
2003 X-Men 2 88
2003 Hulk 62
2004 The Punisher 29
2004 Spider-Man 2 93
2005 Elektra 10
2005 Fantastic Four 27
2006 X-Men: The Last Stand 57
2007 Ghost Rider 26
2007 Spider-Man 3 63
2007 Fantastic Four 2 37
2008 Iron Man 94
2008 The Incredible Hulk 66
2008 Punisher: War Zone 26
2009 X-Men Origins: Wolverine 37
2010 Iron Man 2 74
2011 Thor 77
2011 X-Men: First Class 87
2011 Captain America 79

Average 59.43

Median 63

Standard deviation 26.58

Independent average 78

Independent median 77

Independent std dev 10.22
Titles in red were independently produced by Marvel studios.

On average, Marvel's films tend to be a little better than DC's.

Lowest of the low: Superman IV, Catwoman, Elektra (10%)
Best of the best: Superman, The Dark Knight, Iron Man (94%)



Sunday, December 25, 2011

Merry Christmas!

We mailed this on Saturday. You may or may not receive one in the next few days. Depends on how much we like you.


Merry Christmas and Happy New Year 2010, er, 2011!

Saturday, December 17, 2011

Dying of Laughter

Star Wars as an allegory of Vatican II.


Here's the part where I had tears in my eyes:
The heroes involved with saving the Church from the Culture of Death, i.e. rescuing Leia from the Death Star, was Paul VI, John Paul II, and the faithful Catholic laity … that is, Obi-Wan Kenobi, Luke Skywalker, and Han Solo. 
The way to destroy of the Culture of Death is, paradoxically, by means of more life … that is, by sex, impregnation … and so forth. At the battle of Yavin, the rebels intend to symbolically do just that … namely (hear me out on this one) … have sex with the Death Star. Oh, man, I’ve really lost it haven’t I? The rebel starfighters attempt to shoot proton torpedos (which vaguely look like sperm) into a small exhaust port (which, I’ll just say it, represents the vaginal opening). Furthermore, the rebel’s ships are called X-Wings and Y-Wings … which are, of course, represent X Chromosomes and Y Chromosomes (i.e. the sex-determining structures of DNA involved in reproduction). Moreover, imperial TIE Fighters, which represent contraception (i.e. TIEing one’s tubes … and later on TIE “Interceptors” which sound like “Contraceptors”), try to destroy them to prevent this symbolic act of impregnation.
While Luke is narrowing in on the target with his targeting computer, Obi-Wan mystically tells him to “let go” and just “use the force,” as the computer is destined to fail. In other words, Obi-Wan is encouraging a natural method for this act rather than an artificial one. Luke obeys him, and it works. This, of course, parallels how Paul VI advocated natural sex as opposed to artificial birth control, and John Paul II followed his predecessor in this. John Paul II thus helped to blow up of the Culture of Death with his … yes, that’s right …Theology of the Body (his pivotal work explaining to the modern mind the correct view one should have with regard to human sexuality).
(H/T Mike Flynn)

Wednesday, December 14, 2011

Did you know that the number 31 ...

... is XXXI in Roman Numerals?
... is the third Mersenne Prime (2^5 - 1)?
... is a twin Prime (with 29)?
... is a centered triangular number, a centered pentagonal number, and a centered decagonal number?
... is a self number?
... divides every 15th number of the form 3...31?
... is the atomic number of Gallium, a metal which melts at only 85 degrees?
... is the Messier number of the Andromeda Galaxy?
... was the jersey number of the legendary Greg Maddux, the first MLB pitcher to win the Cy Young award 4 years in a row, and has been retired by both the Cubs and the Braves?
... is the number of musical triads?
... is the number of flavors at Baskin-Robbins?
... was the year B.C. that Octavian Caesar's naval forces defeated those of Mark Antony and Cleopatra at the Battle of Actium?
... was possibly the year Christ was crucified?
... is the age of Joe Belland as of today?

Happy Birthday, Joe!

Tuesday, November 29, 2011

Really Totally Looks Like

"I'm so smart," I hear you saying. "I can tell Anthony and Damien apart by their hair!"

Well, OK then, you clever person you. Let's see how well you do when hats are added and hair is removed from the picture:


What do Resident Murlocs have for babies? Baby Murlocs!

This was hard to take. Damien kept taking Murky and putting him back in the living room where he belonged. OCD babby is CDO.


Two out of two babbies prefer the taste of swords.





Monday, November 28, 2011

Diablo III Beta: First Impressions

For all zero of you who are interested.

[Editor's note. I started writing this after first playing it in September. Then I forgot about it.]

So, after a furious weekend [circa Sep. 9-11] of computer-playing, I managed to complete the Diablo III beta with all five character classes. It was hard work, but someone had to do it.

So here are my impressions.

In a word: "visceral". Everything packs punch. Every ability and spell. Every hit and kill has a wonderfully satisfying "thwack" behind it. Corpses flying; blood splattering; stone crumbling; book cases exploding. Everything feels weighty.

Class I'm most unexpectedly impressed by: Wizard. I did not like the wizard when I played her at Blizzcon a few years back. She seemed under-powered and uninteresting. But after dispatching approximately 4,294,967,296 enemies by shooting LIGHTING out of my FINGERTIPS, I am a changed man. And the way the lightning crackles when disintegrating enemies? Magnifique!


Class I'm most unexpectedly unimpressed by: Witch Doctor. I fell in love with the witch doctor at Blizzcon some years ago for one simple reason: Flaming Skulls 'o Doom. Unfortunately, that spell is not available in the beta. While fun, the witch doctor just lacked the oomph of the other classes.

Class I'm most expectedly impressed by: Demon Hunter. Exactly as awesome as I expected.

Design decision I'm most disappointed in: Lack of level-up choices. The original Diablo had skill points, earned upon level-up, that could be assigned to the attribute(s) of your choosing. Diablo II had skill trees which were actually the inspiration for and predecessor to WoW's talent trees. Diablo III? Nuthin. No decisions or choices are made upon leveling up. Instead, you are given a fixed train of progression. You have no choice in which skills you get next, and have no ability to put points into particular abilities. Instead, you are assigned a new skill, and merely have the choice of whether or not you are going to use it.

Add on to this the fact that, in the beta, you only have two, then later three, skills that can be active at once, and there isn't a whole lot of variety in character builds. Of course, in the final game, you'll have a couple dozen skills from which you can choose six active abilities, then customize each one with a runestone. Blizzard has stated the number of possible character builds, and it's somewhere north of the number of elementary particles in the universe.

Biggest adjustment: The concept of "lagging out" of a single-player game. What do you mean I can't play by myself because I couldn't connect to the login server? Why do I need to login to a single-player game? Why do I have latency when I'm by myself?

Exhibit A for why Blizzard should just make the WoW movie themselves, as a CGI film: This trailer, unveiled at this years Blizzcon.


To wit:

Photograph or CGI rendering? Does it matter at this point?
Approximate number of hours I will lose to Diablo III, upon release: 65,536

Sunday, November 20, 2011

8/979 Postiversary!

So I haven't quite written another 500 posts in the last four years. So sue me. But while we're celebrating this blog's 8th anniversary and 979th post, why don't we look at some of the best articles of the last four years?

Top 10h posts, Nov. 21 2007 – Nov. 20 2011

10. Belland Family, Inc. Announces First Expansion to Popular "Family Life" Simulator
F. "The Banalization of Sexuality"
E. Play Like a Pirate Day
D. Babby Vs. Death Star
C. Infrequently User Units of Measurement
B. Catechebulary
A. The RESPONSIBILITY of Self Defense (had to get one from Tom in there)
9. Hey! It's that Guy!
8. Once, While in a Late Night Fog
7. The Nine Most Important Words Ever Spoken
6. Beate Joannes Paulus Magnus, Ora Pro Nobis!
5. Happy Monday
4. Quaestiones
3. Offering of Indulgences: An Operations Research Approach
2. The Six-Toed Wonder
1. A Very Different Raid Night

(Others I liked that didn't make the top 10h: Magic JacketF.U. News Mailbag, March 18th, 2008The Simple Emperor's Daybook, FLASH: A Woman is Pregnant!A Moral QuandryFirst Pictures of the Little OneAlong the Lines of "Me on the Dating Scene"A Handy ComparisonBlizzard Story-Writing Cheat SheetIt's Just Too EasyShopping for a Delli SandwichCosplay Twenty-TenGoodnight, Sleep Tight, Don't Let Order Sixty-Six BiteBlogging in the Olden DaysLiving History)


So, four more years, and I'm still around. It's interesting to see how much my life has changed since then, let alone since I started this blog. I wonder how it will change in four more. To think that Damien will just be starting first grade....

Sunday, November 13, 2011

Two Oxford Professors Go for a Walk in the Woods...



Brought to you by Kevin O'Brien, who you may know better as Stanford Nutting.

(H/T Why I am Catholic)

Friday, November 11, 2011

What We're Watching

So with the cancellation of V, Stargate Universe, and Heroes within the last few years, and with 24 ending its run, The Murloc and I were concerned we weren't going to have any TV to watch in the evenings, after the chil'uns had gone to bed. We were basically down to Castle, Futurama (only in the summer), and Mythbusters.

Well, the Powers That Be seemed to have decided that this could not stand, and have bestowed upon us lesser mortals more TV fare than we can reasonably consume each week. So here's a breakdown of what we're watching, so you can look down your noses at we who watch too much TV.

Sundays:
The Walking Dead, AMC: Everyone got in to this during the first season last year, and I wanted to give it a shot, but didn't. Finally, after everyone started raving about the second season premiere last month, The Murloc and I decided to add it to the list. After watching the first season on Netflix in two days (it was only six episodes), we got into this one. It's a pretty good take on the forthcoming Zombie Apocalypse, based on a graphic novel. Oh, and apparently, it's very violent. I couldn't tell you, because at some point between murdering hordes of infected with a chainsaw in Left 4 Dead 2, such that I could only see the entrails dribbling from the piles of bodies through the only little splotch on my screen that wasn't covered in blood, and causing the limbs and heads to explode off enemies with a well placed crit in Fallout 3, I became completely desensitized to violence.

Also, I have a theory that when the Zombie Apocalypse actually does happen, it will be stopped almost immediately because we'll all know what to do.

Once Upon A Time, ABC: The Evil Queen casts a curse on Snow White and Prince Charming, and everyone else in the kingdom, erasing their memories and condemning them to never find true happiness by trapping them in a small town in... Maine. No description can do it justice, and it's probably the most imaginative thing on TV in years, brought to you by the writers of Lost. The story revolves around Snow White and Prince Charming's grandson, now adopted by the Evil Queen (who is mayor of the town), who seeks out his mother, who escaped the curse, to bring her back to help break the curse. This is one of three shows that I can't wait for each week.

Mondays:
Terra Nova, Fox: In 2149, the Earth lies in the midst of environmental collapse, but a portal to 85 million BC has opened up to allow humanity to escape to an earlier time—with dinosaurs! This show had me hooked within the first few minutes, but that may just be because I'm a sucker for plots that involve dystopian future societies that limit family size. This show has an interesting premise—with dinosaurs!—and likable characters (including one played by the actor of the best character from blue-people Avatar), which are the two most important things for me in a show, which is good, because it's off to a rocky start—with dinorsaurs! The episodes so far have been a mix between forehead-slapping stupidity and genuine intrigue, much like Star Trek: Voyager, of which it reminds me—but with dinosaurs!—and with which it shares some writers. We'll see how this one goes.

Catholicism, PBS: The four episodes that were to air on public television aired here in October, and were every bit as good as I suspected. Fr. Barron just has a way of explaining the faith in an accessible, intellectual, and moving way. Right now, I'm just waiting for the remaining six episodes to air on EWTN.

Castle, ABC: The best show on TV three years running and vehicle for Nathan Fillion's awesomeness, returns for a much-deserved fourth season. Season three ended with Rick Castle professing his love to Kate Beckett as she lied bleeding from a gunshot wound. Upon recovery, she claims not to have remembered, but we know better. Come for the Firefly references, stay for the great mysteries and crime drama.

Tuesdays:
Last Man Standing, ABC: Why am I watching Tim Allen's new sit-com, which is functionally identical to Home Improvement, but he has three daughters instead of three sons? Shut up, that's why.

Wednesdays:
Mythbusters, Discovery: Stuff blows up. 'Nuff said.

Penn & Teller Tell a Lie, Discovery: Quite clever show, where Penn makes seven amazing claims, of which six are true and one is an utter fabrication. The magic/comedy duo is humorous, and interesting.

Thursdays:
Person of Interest, CBS: A genius computer programmer designs a computer system for the government that monitors everything (surveillance cameras, conversations, phone calls, emails, etc.) looking for terrorist activity. It sees all crimes, but only reports the big stuff, so the designer puts a back door into the system that feeds him the social security number of people the machine thinks will be involved in murder, either as victim or perpetrator. He recruits ex-special-forces operative Jim Caviezel, whom you may remember as Jesus Christ, to assist him. Developed by J.J. Abrams (Alias, Lost, Fringe, Star Trek (2009)) and Jonathan Nolan (Memento, The Prestige, The Dark Knight), filled to the brim with intrigue and action, this is easily in the top three things on TV this season.

Fridays:
Grimm, NBC: The second fairy tale-based series in prime time, this one focuses on a detective who is a living relative of The Brothers Grimm, who, as it turns out, wrote about true stories. The detective must "hunt the bad ones", i.e., the villains from the fairy tales. Created by David Greenwalt, who worked with Joss on Buffy and Angel, this one hasn't quite captured my attention like Once Upon a Time. However, I'm willing to give it a try to see where it goes.

Saturdays:
Used for catching up on the rest of the week.

We also find ourselves leaving the TV on Disney channel alot for Damien, so are watching a lot of shows there, the best ones being Phineas and Ferb, and Good Luck Charlie.

Tuesday, November 01, 2011

Monday, October 31, 2011

Happy Halloween!


Statistics Quiz

If you randomly choose an answer to this question from the options provided, what is the chance that you'll choose the correct answer?
A) 25%
B) 50%
C) 0%
D) 25%

(H/T Shamus Young)

Sunday, October 30, 2011

Friday, October 28, 2011

Science Discovers Cure for Too Many Brain Cells

I'll just go ahead and leave this here.




Special guest brain cell killing by Barats and Bereta.

Wednesday, October 26, 2011

The Damien-English Dictionary

The complete vocabulary

  • Mama – Mommy (also used to identify an iPhone)
  • Dada – Daddy/Donald
  • Dadeye – Strawberry
  • Nana – Banana
  • Appo – Apple
  • Ba-ba – Bottle
  • Deedy – Mickey/Teddy
  • Neeny/Ninny – Minnie
  • Bubo – Pluto
  • Doody – Goofy
  • Daisy – Daisy Duck
  • Pete – Pete the Cat
  • Ohtoo – Toodles (Oh Toodles!)
  • Adda/Addeye – Anthony
  • Beeby – Baby (used interchangeably with Anthony for any baby/doll-like object)
  • C-A-T Cat – Cat
  • Mow/Mowf – Mouse
  • Esseh – Elephant
  • Giwah – Giraffe
  • Bee – Bear
  • Meow, Woof, Moo, Baa-a-a, Neigh, Oink, Qua (quack), Do-do-dooo (Cocka-doodle-doo), Twee (tweet, squeak), Roar, Gwah (growl), Ribbit, Hoot, Oo-ah-ah (howler monkey) – Various animal noises
  • Ohwy – (Oh Really?) Snowy Owl sound
  • Yahwy – (Ya Really!) Horned Owl sound
  • Dadum, dadum, dadum, dadum – Shark noises
  • Voom voom – Car sound effect
  • Choo choo – Train sound effect
  • Dwuh – Truck (no F-bombs from our little one)
  • Uh-oh, Oh no! – Various exclamations (usually said with hands on side of head or on cheeks)
  • Night-night! – Goodnight
  • Hi – Hello
  • Bye – Goodbye
  • Aww – What he says when leaning in for a hug
  • Yay! (clapping) – Used after a song
  • Wuh, Two, Twee, Fo, Fi, Si, Sehseh, Ay, Ni, Ten, Lehveh, Twev, Tootee, Fotee, Fitee, Sitee, Sehtee, Aytee, Nitee, Twehtee! – Numbers
  • Weh, Ownh (nasally grunt at the end), Yewo, Gwee, Boo, Popo, Bwa, Why – Colors
  • Whasa? – What's that?
  • Hussssssssss – The old woman whispering "hush"
  • Up, UP, UP! – Where the Snort takes the Baby Bird
  • Boo (short oo) – Book
  • Boo! (long oo) – Boo!
  • Deedoo! – Peekaboo!
  • Yoda, Ahtoo – Star Wars characters
  • Bah – Ball
  • Bwah – Block
  • Soosoo – Circle
  • Suhsuhsuh – Cylinder
  • Cue – Cube
  • Twiah – Triangle
  • Eye, No, Mouf, Ee (ear), Heh (head/hair), Chee (cheek), Teef, Knee, Foo, Toe – Body parts
  • Fafa, suh, *kiss* – The Sign of the Cross, kissing the Rosary at the end
Further bulletins as events warrant.

Tuesday, October 25, 2011

QFT

"If you're going to come here and get our food, bedding and clothing, have books and medical supplies for no charge, they need to give back. There's a lot of takers here and they feel entitled." [Emphasis added.]

--Lauren Digioia, member of the OWS Sanitation Comittee, on the vagrants in Zuccotti Park, quoted in the NY Daily News.

(H/T Mike Flynn)

Sunday, October 23, 2011

The Art of Non-Argument: How to Debate without Debating

There is a strand of argumentation that I have been seeing very frequently of late, and it is one of which I have become increasingly weary, and would love nothing more than if the entire world just agreed to drop the whole thing for the good of mankind. Rightly speaking, it isn't really even an argument, but rather a non-argument. It is an attempt to do away with argument, stop it cold in its tracks, so that the conversation can't continue.


This non-argument is seen in many different conversations and is stated in many different ways. It comes up in conversations about law, about justice, and about public morality. Its specifics vary from time to time, but it almost always starts with the following statement: "that may be your personal opinion, but...."

In effect this non-argument does not insist that the opposing view is wrong, but rather that the opposing view is irrelevant. It doesn't matter how reasonable, how rational, or how true the opposing view is. All that matters is that the opposing view has no place interfering with the outside world. It is not an attempt to refute the view, or show where the one proposing it has erred. It is a trump card, designed not to engage in debate, but rather to avoid debate altogether. Playing this trump card is simply an attempt to prevent the logic and reason of others from having influence on one's own thought.

And I can easily see why one might be tempted to make this non-argument. As we have seen from the ladder of inference, the premises we take to a conversation—true or false—are personal and based on our experiences. Another person, with another set of experiences, may approach the conversation with a different premise. Since no amount of rational argument or reasonable deduction will convince another person that his experiences did not happen, it is in most cases impossible to change the opinion of the other person. And since the premises—and experiences upon which they are based—are not only not the topic of the conversation, but most frequently are not even brought up, we most often don't even know why we disagree on the topic. The rude person assumes the other person has a defective brain, and calls him stupid or his views irrational. The charitable person, trying to understand how a seemingly intelligent and reasonable person may have arrived at such an unintelligent and unreasonable conclusion, may be tempted to simply invoke the non-argument. That is, "well, the person may have reasons for his belief, but since they are not my reasons, they don't affect me." Hence, the "that may be your personal belief...."

What irks me most about the non-argument, is that, in its attempt to defuse the disagreement charitably, it doesn't seem to have thought itself through very well. For, truly, aren't all our beliefs personal? If one person's argument is not admissible because it's his personal belief, why not any other's? Shouldn't we adopt the post permissible moral code possible? "Well, yes," reply the non-arguers. "To each his own." But then, does that not allow for all sorts of atrocities, from murder, rape, and torture to shoplifting, petty theft and everything in between? "No of course not! You mustn't harm another person!" But... isn't this your personal belief? And since the definition of "person" is one of the very things the non-argument is often used to obfuscate, why should we use your personal definition of personhood over any other? Taking it further, isn't it only your personal belief that personal beliefs should not be forced on others? In its attempt to marginalize the other person's argument, the non-argument marginalizes itself.

The non-argument attempts to reduce law, justice, and morality to the realm of the subjective, such that preference for one morality over another is simply like a preference for chocolate over vanilla. The problem is, I've never met someone who actually treats morality as if its not objective. Those who make the assertion that morality is always a private matter are the ones who are most indignant and most self-righteous at perceived injustices against themselves or others. If all morality is a private matter, subject to personal opinion, then there can be nothing inherently immoral about injustice. On what ground do you protest someone who commits an injustice against another? It may be your personal opinion that his actions are immoral, but who are you to enforce your personal opinions on others?

Of course, I'm being a little unfair here by grouping everyone who makes the non-argument into a group with those who deny objective morality. Many who non-argue are not opposed to the concept of a universal moral law, but rather, simply misunderstand the opposing view. The non-arguer may not understand the reasons behind his opponent's views, and just simply infer that it's for some mysterious unknowable reason. "You only say that because you think the Bible tells you to." But this, again, is a non-argument, because it doesn't address the actual reasons behind the view, just the inferred reasons. It ignores the appeals to natural law and objective truth, and instead simply attacks a strawman.

Despite these obvious (to me) problems with the non-argument, I continue to see it used whenever someone doesn't want to admit a view contrary to their own into the debate. Whenever someone takes a stand for traditional marriage, the non-argument will be made "that's just your personal opinion about marriage! You can't force that on others!" Whenever someone says that it is an injustice to deny the unborn their rights, someone else will non-argue "but that's merely your opinion on personhood! You can't deny a woman her right to choose!" Whenever someone explains the moral difficulties of euthanasia, the non-argument appears, "keep your morality off my body!" In none of the cases is the non-arguer actually making a case about the nature of marriage, the rights of the human person, or the dignity of human life. All he is saying is that all such arguments are irrelevant.

Saturday, October 22, 2011

World of Warcraft: Attack of the Pandas

Following on the heels of their success with 2004's hit World of Warcraft, Blizzard Entertainment upped the stakes. For their 2007 expansion The Burning Crusade, they introduced the corrupted demon-hunter Illidan Stormrage, Lord of the Black Temple.

You are not prepared!
To up the ante even further, for 2008's Wrath of the Lich King, the brought out the Lich King, Arthas, ruler of the Scourge: a race of undead monstrosities, who terrorize the people of Azeroth.

His frozen heart lies beneath the tundra of Northrend.
And building upon that, 2010's Cataclysm introduced Deathwing to the world, a dragon aspect consumed with hatred for all that lives, and whose explosive release unleashed a wave of destructive force across all the world.

The world shall burn.
So what can Blizzard possibly introduce to top this incredible lineup of menacing villains? What is the next horror the denizens of Azeroth face?

Giant Pandas!
Their superpower is the Power of Love.

Thursday, October 20, 2011

Hateful Kitty

Kathleen De Vere, of my favorite Commodore 64-based Canadian sketch comedy group "Loading Ready Run", has seen fit to draw an entry to her webcomic "Things My Cat Hates" based on a suggestion I sent her.

You should go check it out by clicking here.

Or here.

Or here, if you like to wait until the last minute, but that will be your last chance.

Of course, Kathleen, herself, had one of her tweets used in an Old Spice internet response ad last year. For those keeping track, this gives me an Old Spice Man Your Man Could Smell Like index of two.

(OK, I lied. This is really your last chance. For reals.)

Friday, October 14, 2011

Premises, Premises

So, I've had the idea for this post for a while, but haven't been able to put it in words. I had planned writing a long, rambling, boring post, but I realized it could probably be said better shorter.

Also, it helps that SF author, statistician, amateur philosopher and historian, and all around Cool Guy Michael Flynn has done the bulk of the work for me. Recently, he wrote a piece on the "ladder of inference". You should go read it. No, seriously. Go. I'll wait.

All done? To summarize for those too lazy to read, the ladder of inference is basically the process we mentally apply whenever presented with facts. It goes like this:

  1. I observe objectively.
  2. I select data from what I observer.
  3. I add meaning to what I have selected.
  4. I make assumptions based on the meaning I have added.
  5. I draw conclusions, which prompt feelings.
  6. I adopt beliefs about the world.
  7. I take action based on my beliefs and feelings.
Now, there is a loop, called the Reflexive Loop from step 6 to step 2: our beliefs influence what data we select from our observations. This is why two people can be presented with the same set of data and draw completely different conclusions about it. Based on their beliefs, developed from previous experiences, people will notice different things, infer different meanings, and make different assumptions from the same things.

For our purposes, I will refer to these beliefs that influence our observations and actions as "premises". These are not, of course, philosophical premises in the sense of "first principles", since they are based on prior experiences. But, for a given situation, they are the things we assume are a given, and not topics for discussion.

Thursday, October 13, 2011

Wednesday, October 12, 2011

Is This the Line for the Apple Store?

I don't normally recommend the webcomic Least I Could Do, but when I do, it's freaking hilarious.

The "Occupy Wall Street" protests bring three things to my mind:

  1. Why should I care if my neighbor makes a million times more money than I do? Anytime I see some statistic like "the discrepancy between rich and poor is the greatest it's ever been in history" or "the wealthiest 400 Americans have as much money as the poorest 150 million," my reaction is "so?" This is nothing more than a red herring. If the poor have the necessities they need to survive, then it doesn't matter how much money the rich have. If the poor don't have the necessities they need to survive, then it doesn't matter how much money the rich have.
  2. The anger and rage seems to be aimed at "bankers" and "Wall Street". If the protesters could name names and deeds of people who have committed crimes, they may have a point. But to blame "Wall Street" or "bankers" seems to blame a class, rather than a person. You might as well just blame the Jews.
  3. "You shall not covet your neighbor’s house. You shall not covet your neighbor’s wife, his male or female slave, his ox or donkey, or anything that belongs to your neighbor." (Ex. 20:17)
Also, this was interesting, for those who haven't seen it:


Chesterton Quote of the Day/Week/Month

For you mothers.


Supposing it to be conceded that humanity has acted at least not unnaturally in dividing itself into two halves, respectively typifying the ideals of special talent and of general sanity (since they are genuinely difficult to combine completely in one mind), it is not difficult to see why the line of cleavage has followed the line of sex, or why the female became the emblem of the universal and the male of the special and superior. Two gigantic facts of nature fixed it thus: first, that the woman who frequently fulfilled her functions literally could not be specially prominent in experiment and adventure; and second, that the same natural operation surrounded her with very young children, who require to be taught not so much anything as everything. Babies need not to be taught a trade, but to be introduced to a world. To put the matter shortly, woman is generally shut up in a house with a human being at the time when he asks all the questions that there are, and some that there aren't. It would be odd if she retained any of the narrowness of a specialist. Now if anyone says that this duty of general enlightenment (even when freed from modern rules and hours, and exercised more spontaneously by a more protected person) is in itself too exacting and oppressive, I can understand the view. I can only answer that our race has thought it worth while to cast this burden on women in order to keep common-sense in the world. But when people begin to talk about this domestic duty as not merely difficult but trivial and dreary, I simply give up the question. For I cannot with the utmost energy of imagination conceive what they mean. When domesticity, for instance, is called drudgery, all the difficulty arises from a double meaning in the word. If drudgery only means dreadfully hard work, I admit the woman drudges in the home, as a man might drudge at the Cathedral of Amiens or drudge behind a gun at Trafalgar. But if it means that the hard work is more heavy because it is trifling, colorless and of small import to the soul, then as I say, I give it up; I do not know what the words mean. To be Queen Elizabeth within a definite area, deciding sales, banquets, labors and holidays; to be Whiteley within a certain area, providing toys, boots, sheets, cakes and books, to be Aristotle within a certain area, teaching morals, manners, theology, and hygiene; I can understand how this might exhaust the mind, but I cannot imagine how it could narrow it. How can it be a large career to tell other people's children about the Rule of Three, and a small career to tell one's own children about the universe? How can it be broad to be the same thing to everyone, and narrow to be everything to someone? No; a woman's function is laborious, but because it is gigantic, not because it is minute. I will pity Mrs. Jones for the hugeness of her task; I will never pity her for its smallness.


--G.K. Chesterton, What's Wrong with he World, Part 3 "Feminism, or the Mistake about Woman", III "The Emancipation of Domesticity".

Tuesday, October 11, 2011

Some Much Needed Perspective

Ok, let's get something straight. I've seen a risible idea circulating lately and I cannot let it stand, so I have come to set the record straight.

You ready?

Steve Jobs Did Not Change The World.

Blasphemy! I hear you say.

But get over it. He did no such thing.

To prove my point, here's a list of 11 things that Changed the World:

  1. Christianity
  2. Islam
  3. The Roman Empire
  4. Aristotelian and Thomistic philosophy
  5. The scientific world view (that material causes can explain empirical observations without invoking supernatural causes, not that everything can be explained scientifically, I mean).
  6. The Protestant Revolt
  7. The Enlightenment
  8. The steam engine
  9. The industrial revolution
  10. The automobile
  11. Electrification
Here are 5 things that have not changed the world, but have made life slightly more convenient for those living in the first world:
  1. The graphical user interface
  2. The portable MP3 player
  3. The online music store
  4. The smartphone
  5. The tablet PC
The personal computer probably has changed the world (although since it's less than 50 years old, it's hard to say how much those changes will matter in 1000 years), but Steve Jobs did not invent it. Speaking of which, here is a list of 5 things Steve Jobs did not invent:
  1. The graphical user interface
  2. The portable MP3 player
  3. The online music store
  4. The smartphone
  5. The tablet PC
Nope. Nuh-uh. Not a one. What he did is best summarized in this Basic Instructions: Steve Jobs is the kid who copies off your test, then gets a better grade than you.

What Steve Jobs did is shape the development of one world-changing device, and several minor conveniences. All would have developed without him. They might not have developed in the same way. Some ideas may not have been implemented, or taken longer to refine. Maybe the wouldn't have caught on and been as widespread, But they'd still all be there. 

If Steve Jobs never existed, you would still own a personal computer. You'd still be reading my writing on your color rasterizationator through the intertubes. E-Commerce would still exist. You could still listen to music you purchased online on your portable MP3 player. You could check email on your phone. You might do it all differently; you might not do any of it at all, but you still could do it all.

Contrast this with Aristotle and Thomas Aquinas. As Mike Flynn points out, without them, there may never have been a scientific revolution. Universities may not have put such an emphasis on natural philosophy. Middle Ages and Renaissance scientists may never have said "what if" and asked how the world worked. Copernicus, Brahe, and Kepler may never have seen a need to update Ptolemy (it worked; why fix it?). No science, no industrial revolution, no modern life. To be sure, those things may have come, but it may have been centuries later. We might be living in the technological equivalent of the 17th century.

Introducing a fundamental change to the way people view the world, whose echoes still shape thought 2000 years later. That's changing the world. Not making a device that allows rich people to listen to music on the go.

Saturday, October 01, 2011

Photodump

Totally Looks Like

Anthony totally looks like Perry the Platypus.

Damien totally looks like Anthony

Therefore, Damien totally looks like Perry the Platypus

Monday, September 26, 2011

Catholicism on Public Television

Father Robert Barron's Catholicism will be airing on PBS stations nationwide, as well as on EWTN. You will want to catch this one. It's inspired by Kenneth Clark's Civilisation and looks to be amazing. You can find out more (and watch clips from it) here.

You can also find out air dates for your area here.

For those of us in LA/Orange Counties, episodes 1, 3, 4, and 5 will be on KLCS (channel 58) Mondays at 9pm, starting October 3rd. KVCR (channel 24) will air it Tuesdays at 8pm, starting on the 11th. Those in Lake Elsinore, I assume, can get KVCR (Riverside/San Bernardino).

If those in Bakersfield can get Fresno stations, KVPT will air all four PBS episodes on October 23rd starting at 11am.

In the Tampa area, you can catch it on WEDU on Wednesdays at 11pm, starting October 5th.

In Chicago (Fr. Barron's home diocese), it will be on WTTW Thursdays at 8pm starting October 13th, with encores the following Sundays at 4pm.

In South Bend (I think I have readers there?) it will be on WNIT Thursdays, October 13th and 20th, from 9-11pm.

If those in the DC area weren't so busy trying to raise well-adjusted children, and still had access to on-air television, they could have watched the first episode on Maryland PTV this past Thursday at 8pm, and the second this coming Thursday, the 29th, at the same time.

If I missed anyone, check here for your market.

The remaining episodes (2, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10) will air on EWTN on November 16th-19th, repeatedly.

And if you can't catch it on TV, potentially because you're lame or because you live in a stone-age commune and don't have TV, you can buy the DVD box set for a kingly sum of $150 (I know what's going on my Birthday/Christmas list this year!). Or you can wait for your parish to host a showing, unless you go to some hippie new-age parish.

There's also a book to go along with it. Again, you will not want to miss this.

Friday, September 16, 2011

How to Make a Kia Commercial



(With apologies to Shamus Young)

Wednesday, August 17, 2011

How To: Install an App from the Apple App Store™ to your iPhone

The great thing about Apple products is how easy they are to use. This is no less true of the iPhone. Installing apps on Android is so hard, what with the choice of vendors. Do I want to buy something from the Android Marketplace or the Amazon App Store? So many decisions. It just makes the process so complex.

Well, Apple doesn't have that problem. In fact, they make it so easy to download and install a (free) app. How easy, you ask? Well, it's so easy I can explain it in 82 simple steps.

Step 1: Locate the app you wish to download on the App Store™. To do this, enter the app name in the "search" tab of the App Store™.


Friday, August 12, 2011

On the Motion of the Moon in the Margaret Wise Brown Classic "Goodnight Moon"

Please observe the following composite image, taken from several different exposures of the moon.


It is clear from the non-linear motion of the moon across the sky that the orbit of the moon is not a simple ellipse. This is probably because the planet inhabited by the race of sentient bunny-like aliens (henceforth: Planet Bun) is probably in a non-stable multi-body system. It likely involves multiple other moons, planets, and potentially stars, although we can clearly see from the view out this window that the stars must all be opposite Planet Bun from the observer. The intense gravitational forces from the other unseen bodies of the system must steer the moon in a strange path, and not in an elliptical orbit around Planet Bun.

Also, based on the fact that the pattern of the  background stars changes so rapidly between each exposure, we can conclude that Planet Bun itself must be orbiting or rotating at a very high velocity. In fact, the "moon" may not be a satellite of Planet Bun at all. It could very well be a double planet or, judging by the lack of surface features, a white dwarf star that Planet Bun itself is orbiting. In fact, judging by just how quickly Planet Bun's view of the background stars changes, it may be quite likely that the "moon" is in fact a neutron star, which Planet Bun orbits in hours or minutes. The orbital distance is likely quite close in order for a small star to have such a high angular diameter.

Note also how the apparent motion of the "moon"-like neutron star speeds up between the fixed-interval exposures. This is likely because Planet Bun is in a highly-elliptical orbit and it is approaching perigee, causing the vast orbital speed increase.

Thursday, July 28, 2011

The (Big) Boy

Lest we forget about the firstborn, a couple Damien stories.

On Sunday, as we were rushing out the door to Mass, Damien apparently thought we weren't rushing fast enough and wanted to leave. So he grabbed me, pulled me over to the hallway closet, opened it, took my hat out, put it on my head, then ran to the front door. He knows that daddy putting on his hat is the last thing that needs to be done before we leave.

Then today, after changing him, I had left his shoes on the floor because I was in a hurry to change Anthony. Damien picked up his shoes, took them to the closet, opened the closet, put away his shoes (in the proper place), then closed the closet.

Anne Marie comments that he's better about putting away his shoes than I am.

Tuesday, July 26, 2011

Peas and Pods

Can you figure out which picture is which brother? (Highlight to read answers.)

Anthony on left, Damien on right.

Anthony on left, Damien on right.

Ha! Trick question. Both are Anthony.

Damien on left, Anthony on right.

Damien on left, Anthony on right.

Damien on left, Anthony on right.

Anthony on left, Damien on right.
I just pray that they grow up as close to each other as I did with my brother.

Twins, separated by two years.

Sunday, July 24, 2011

A Better Pain Scale

H/T Hyperbole and a Half



Key:
0: Hi. I am not experiencing any pain at all. I don't know why I'm even here.
1: I am completely unsure whether I am experiencing pain or itching or maybe I just have a bad taste in my mouth.
2: I probably just need a Band Aid.
3: This is distressing. I don't want this to be happening to me at all.
4: My pain is not @%&!ing around.
5: Why is this happening to me??
6: Ow. Okay, my pain is super legit now.
7: I see Jesus coming for me and I'm scared.
8: I am experiencing a disturbing amount of pain. I might actually be dying. Please help.
9: I am almost definitely dying.
10: I am actively being mauled by a bear.
11: Blood is going to explode out of my face at any moment.
Too Serious For Numbers: You probably have ebola. It appears that you may also be suffering from Stigmata and/or pinkeye.
The Laboring Murloc says her contractions fall between a 4 ("My pain is not @%&!ing around") and 5 ("Why is this happening to me??"), so we're heading to the hospital now. All further updates will be on Facebook.

Monday, July 18, 2011

The Official Rankings (Updated)

  1. Anthropomorphic Superheroes
  2. Anthropomorphic Monsters
  3. Anthropomorphic Robots
  4. Anthropomorphic Old Guys, Dogs, and Boyscout
  5. Anthropomorphic Cars
  6. Anthropomorphic Rats
  7. Anthropomorphic Toys (third time)
  8. Anthropomorphic Fish
    ---The good/great dividing line---
  9. Anthropomorphic Cars (again)
  10. Anthropomorphic Toys (again)
  11. Anthropomorphic Bugs
  12. Anthropomorphic Toys
Although it was not made by the studio whose mascot is an anthropomorphic desk lamp, last year's "Anthropomorphic Princess with really long hair" fits between #2 and #3 on this list, and although it was not made by the company whose mascot is an anthropomorphic mouse, last year's "Anthropomorphic Dragons and Vikings" fits between #4 and #5. Those are the only two non-anthropomorphic Desk Lamp 3D animated feature films that I can think of (off the top of my head) that fit somewhere on this list.

Thursday, July 07, 2011

Happy 100th Birthday, Gian Carlo Menotti!

In honor of the composer of the first television opera (Amahl and the Night Visitors), we present to you a bit of culture.

The Telephone, an opera in one act, by Gian Carlo Menotti, heard in this 2000 recording, directed by Dr. Susan Treacy, with Celeste Ingram, soprano, Daniel Morton, baritone, and Yr. Obd. Svt., piano accompaniment.

Wednesday, July 06, 2011

Living History

Yesterday, I read, with a strange sense of loss, that perhaps the most historical man I'd ever met passed away. I am, of course, talking about Otto von Habsburg, who passed away on July 4th at the age of 98.

To give you an idea of what a piece of living history this man was, let me give you some background. He was born November 20th, 1912, the eldest son of Blessed Charles I of Austria (who you may remember, Blessed John Paul the Great beatified in 2004). Charles I was the last emperor of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, and a great Catholic statesman. Austria was the only power that did not engage in chemical warfare during the Great War, mainly because of Charles' abhorrence of it, and warfare in general. So dedicated was Charles to peace that he sought a separate peace with the Allies, apart from Germany (but the French managed to ruin that).

Otto von Habsburg was the last Crown Prince of the Austro-Hungarian Empire. He was a pretender to the thrones of about half of central Europe, and—through his family—a link to the once-great Holy Roman Empire. He was a stalwart opponent of both Nazism and Communism, for which the former group sentenced him to death for opposing the Anschluss in 1938. He was instrumental in aiding the Allies during World War II, and played a role in the downfall of Communism in the 80's.

During my Adventures in Austria, circa 2001, I had the great privilege of meeting this man, this living historical figure. The director of the Austrian program had invited him to the Karthause to speak to us students, and graciously, the Archduke agreed. I was interested in his visit, because as a recent graduate of Miss Smyth's Grand History of Western Civilization, I was well versed on House Hapsburg. He spoke to use students at length, one evening, giving a rambling talk about Austria, her history, her people, and his place in it. While the details of the talk have become hazy in the ten years since, I still remember a couple details quite clearly.

His Imperial and Royal Highness Archduke and Prince Imperial Otto of Austria, Prince Royal of Hungary, Croatia and Bohemia, seen here in this 2001 file photo. Photographer, Your Truly.
What struck me most about his talk was the personal, eyewitness accounts he gave of momentous historical events. He told stories about how he personally delivered Hungarian spy reports to FDR, or how, as a representative of Austria during World War II, he was given advanced notice of the Allied bombing raids. Invariably, each week an Austrian church or monastery would be targeted. He would speak with Roosevelt's assistant who, as a good Irish Catholic, would manage to postpone the raids that targeted churches.

One story I remember most clearly was the one he told about when he discovered the Allies' plans to divvy up Austria and give the lion's share (including Vienna) to the Soviet Union, as part of the peace treaty. He immediately rushed to see FDR and said, while he had always admired him and his methods of resisting the Communists, this was a bad idea. FDR agreed and told Otto that if he could get Churchill to agree, he would renegotiate. Otto immediately rushed to Churchill's room to speak with him. The secretary said that Churchill was sleeping, and he wasn't to be awoken, unless it was a matter of life or death. Otto said it was, and met with the sleepy Churchill, and convinced him to side with him and FDR. In the end, the Soviet Union took only a very small part of Austria.


Travelling Europe and seeing the history is interesting for an American such as myself, particularly one from Los Angeles, where anything older than 50 years is considered ancient. Seeing all these great monuments from ancient Rome, or cathedrals of the middle ages, or castles of the Renaissance. It's just something we don't have here. But there was another interesting side to Europe as well, and that was the history of the last hundred years. In that time, Europe had been the battlefield for the two greatest wars mankind has ever waged, and the site of the two most evil regimes the world has ever known. Here was a man who was linked to all of it, and spoke of it off the cuff, off the top of this head, as if this recent history was an old colleague of his.

Truly, the history of the 20th century is now just a little more remote.

Current Earth-Destruction Status This page is Class A WWW Depricated

Lilypie Third Birthday tickers
Lilypie First Birthday tickers
All material on these pages is ©2003-2010 by Joe Belland, Dave Belland, Tom Adams, Cari Burud and/or Paul Harold except for the stuff that we blatantly stole from other sources. All rights reserved.