I Can Has?
Brilliantly Written by
Joe
at
6:29 PM
2
Witless Retort(s)
File Under: funny pictures, kittens, lowest form of blogging
This blog is incomplete; you can help by expanding it.
Brilliantly Written by
Joe
at
6:29 PM
2
Witless Retort(s)
File Under: funny pictures, kittens, lowest form of blogging
| Hi! |
Brilliantly Written by
Joe
at
4:09 PM
2
Witless Retort(s)
File Under: babby, Damien, phunny story
Point: There is no cause for alarm
Brilliantly Written by
Joe
at
6:46 PM
0
Witless Retort(s)
File Under: nuclear wessels, point/counterpoint, satire
"Obviously, she’s not happy with dealing with a president who can’t decide if today is Tuesday or Wednesday"
On Wednesday, church founder Robert H. Schuller said he strongly disapproved of the covenant [which states that Crystal Cathedral ministries preaches chastity] because it goes against what he has built his church upon.
"I have a reputation worldwide of being tolerant of all people and their views," he told the Orange County Register. "I'm too well-educated to criticize a certain religion or group of people for what they believe in [further evidence for Dennis Prager's maxim that the more time you spend in college, the dumber you get]. It's called freedom."
Brilliantly Written by
Joe
at
9:51 PM
0
Witless Retort(s)
File Under: dictatorship of relativism, Idiot award, LinkDump, President Obamessiah, religion
"What were you doing last night?" The Murloc asks me.
Brilliantly Written by
Joe
at
5:51 PM
1 Witless Retort(s)
File Under: phunny story, Random
So last December, I received this email, which I'm sure is from a scammer or spammer or some other nefarious person:
***Begin Transmission***
From: Pierce [If that is his real name] <*snip*>
To: JoeCool (at) gmail (dot) com
Date: Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 4:21 AM
Subject: I love your blog! [This is how I know he's up to no good; no one who is not related to me biologically or through marriage, a former college roommate of mine, or my confirmation sponsor, loves my blog]
Hi Joseph Belland, [Not only is he evil an untrustworthy, but he's also a mind-reader! How else could he know my full name? Maybe he's a Sith. Oh, wouldn't that be cool to have an evil Sith who's stalking me via my blog?]
I really enjoyed reading your blog. [More lies!] In particular, I liked your link to the Pi Song (2007) and the 10,000 Pi digits (2006) [Okay, those were kinda cool]; you offer up some great suggestions on how to celebrate Pi Day as well! [Well, thank you, evil Sith lord!]
I just finished this cool infographic on Visualizing Pi and thought you might be interested. You can check it out here: http://www.onlineschooling.net/visualizing-pi.
I thought your readers might enjoy the graphic and wanted to see if you would consider posting a link to it from your blog [I'll consider it, but no promises]. Let me know what you think of it.
Thanks! Pierce
Pierce Brown Online Schooling.net *snip*@sreducationgroup.org
Brilliantly Written by
Joe
at
6:00 AM
2
Witless Retort(s)
So Damien's learned a new word... "Yoda". We start them young.
You ask him "Where's Yoda?" and he runs and gets his little Yoda toy.
Brilliantly Written by
Joe
at
12:00 PM
2
Witless Retort(s)
I think for me, the hardest part of Lent--harder than not posting stupid trivialities to Facebook, or pwning n00bs in Medal of Duty: Modern Battlefield Assault--is the constant feeling of hunger. Not from fasting, or lack of food, or lack of meat. Simply from the lack of sweets. My body seems to have some mechanism, in which I don't actually feel satisfied until I've had dessert. It doesn't have to be much. But the sugar somehow tells my brain, "ok, you're done eating now." Without that trigger, I never feel satisfied, no matter how full I get.
The mechanism for this was always clear to me, as a child, and yet my mother, for some reason, needed to be schooled in the basic principles. I clearly remember one dinnertime meal when I informed her that-after having finished the meat or pasta or whatever we were having, and leaving the vegetables untouched--I was completely stuffed, and couldn't possibly eat another bite. Of course, it was entirely coincidental that I happened to fill up right before getting to my veggies.
Shortly afterwards, the ice cream came out for those good boy and girl who had cleaned their plates. I informed my mother of me desire for ice cream, too. "But how can you have any ice cream when you're so completely stuffed full?"
She thought she had me, but that was really only a sign of her ignorance. I, of course, being the good, charitable little boy that I was, corrected her error, and informed her about the basic anatomical lesson that all little boys who wanted dessert but not vegetables knew. "My dinner pipe is full, but my dessert pipe is still empty." I mean, duh. How could she not know about the different pipes where food was stored? How could she not know that dessert went into a different bodily compartment than dinner?
Sheesh.
Brilliantly Written by
Joe
at
6:00 PM
2
Witless Retort(s)
Giving up the usuals:
Brilliantly Written by
Joe
at
6:35 PM
4
Witless Retort(s)
File Under: Lent, practicing the faith, ramblings
Question 1: Whether Blogging Is Permissible when One has Given Up the Internet for Lent.
Objection 1. It would seem otherwise, since the blog itself, and the means of posting to it, reside on and require access to the Internet, respectively.
Objection 2. Furthermore, merely writing the blog posts offline in a word processor, then uploading them on Sunday would also violate this resolution, since the essential nature of the promise--to avoid the frivolous use of time on the Internet during Lent--is still broken by spending time on a pursuit that has as its natural end a form of communication that requires the Internet.
On the contrary, blogging is not essentially different from writing for printed media, which is a worthwhile and non-trivial pursuit, and not covered by any promise to give up the Internet for Lent.
I answer that, the vow to give up the Internet during Lent is a shorthand method of stating "giving up frivolous pursuits using the Internet," which the Philosopher surely would have agreed is one of the primary usages of the Internet. However, especially for one who has vowed to spend more time writing during Lent, blogging is not necessarily a frivolous pursuit, so long as care is taken to avoid the Five Lowest Forms. In fact, for one who has promised to spend more time writing, a blog is no different than any other media for the promulgation of the written word.
This simplistic understanding of the prohibition of the use of the Internet during Lent, in fact, stands as an obstacle to one who must write more, especially if his primary word processor is an online application. Clearly, one can promise to write more and also simultaneously not waste time on the Internet.
This is particularly evident for one whose job requires use of the Internet and email. Since his Lentent penance cannot supersede his duty to use the just fruits of the Internet to do his job, it can clearly be seen that giving up the Internet for Lent does not include all uses of the Internet, but merely those that are contrary to productivity.
Reply to Objection 1. While blogging does indeed use the Internet in myriad ways, both as a means of creating the content (form) of the blog post, and of posting the content for others to read (matter), this usage of the Internet can promote a self-betterment and more effective use of time, which is not what is intended to be avoided when one gives up the Internet for Lent.
Reply to Objection 2. That blogging is not essentially different from other forms of the written word seems to lend credence to the idea that blogging is allowed to one who has given up the Internet for Lent. If an act is no different from another act, any prohibitions against the one ought apply to the other, and should the first be acceptable, so ought the second.
Brilliantly Written by
Joe
at
7:59 PM
6
Witless Retort(s)
File Under: arguments in the dialectic, Facebook, Lent, St. Thomas Aquinas